> Just FYI, things are really starting to shake up in the MySQL++
> Subversion tree. Each revision is still usable, but there have been a
> lot of API and ABI breakages recently. If any of you were thinking of
> helping out with the testing for v2.0, now's a good time to start
> building your programs against it, to give us early feedback on the
> changes so far.
So far, I've hit only one regression-miss in my code, and I can't seem
to get to the cause of it. Hope someone knows.
I did a query for a non-existant something with a select, and
conceptually it contains a but (should check for error before getting a
Query q = d_connection.query();
q << "select id from table where something";
ResUse result = q.use();
Row row = result.fetch_row();
However, with 2.0.0 (svn: 772) there is no way to find out that the
query didn't return any results. I would assume that either one
should be true after the q.use():
q.success() == false
result.eof() == true
result.operator bool() == false
Neither of the above is true. Am I missing something?
Also, my compiler was giving warnings about a non-virtual destructor in
lieu of virtual functions inherited from Lockable. Since the virtuals in
Lockable do seem ok to me, I applied the following totally trivial
--- lib/connection.h (revision 772)
+++ lib/connection.h (working copy)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
unsigned int client_flag = 0);
/// \brief Destroy connection object
+ virtual ~Connection();
/// \brief Connect to database after object is created.