List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Steven Staples Date:June 16 2010 1:09pm
Subject:RE: Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32
View as plain text  

Out of curiosity, do you (or anyone else) know what could be an issue with
upgrading to even 5.0.93?  or even the 5.1 branch?

There are a lot of stored procedures/functions, as well as the fact that it
is being replicated (the backup server is running multiple instances, and
is replicating 3 other servers).   So, all the sql databases will have to
be updated/upgraded, but is there anything I/we should be made aware of
before we go ahead? (there is a lot of release notes to sift through)

Steven Staples

> -----Original Message-----
> From: baron.schwartz@stripped [mailto:baron.schwartz@stripped] On Behalf
> Of Baron Schwartz
> Sent: June 15, 2010 4:56 PM
> To: mysql@stripped
> Subject: Re: Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32
> Steven,
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Steven Staples <sstaples@stripped> wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > I have a stored procedure that probably does a lot more than it should,
> but
> > it works fine on my test server (which is running 5.0.67).   When I
> it
> > over to the production server, (which is running 5.0.32 and I never
> thought
> > to check that the versions were the same before) it works almost
> perfectly.
> It sounds like you're running into a bug, simply put.  5.0.32 is very
> old and an amazing amount of bugs have been fixed since then.  I would
> not even consider running it in production.  I know it'll be tough to
> upgrade, but if you don't, my experience is that another of the
> unfixed bugs is going to cause you serious pain anyway, such as
> crashing your server.
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives:
> To unsubscribe:
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG -
> Version: 9.0.829 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2917 - Release Date: 06/15/10
> 02:35:00

Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32Steven Staples1 Jun
  • Re: Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32Baron Schwartz15 Jun
    • RE: Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32Steven Staples16 Jun
      • Re: Strange GREATEST() result in 5.0.32Baron Schwartz16 Jun