List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Gary Richardson Date:March 9 2005 4:23pm
Subject:Re: safe way of replication?
View as plain text  
I would probably not replica the mysql database in your case.

We run a similar setup. One problem we have is people connecting to
the wrong database server and applying updates (for example, they
think they are in the master, but it's really the slave and they
perform an update or an insert). As you can guess, it causes problems
with data integrity. In order to get around this, we remove
insert,update,delete from our users on the slave..


On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:49:10 +0200, Chris Knipe <savage@stripped> wrote:
> Lo all,
> Just wondering... Would the below be considered a "safe" way to do
> replication...
> MasterBD:  One Database (most Critical)
> SlaveDB: Replicating all databases from MasterBD as well as hosting allot of
> other 3rd party, or customer DBs.
> Basically, the MasterBD holds a single critical database for our company
> (i.e. main database).  The slave DB then becomes a slave for the MasterDB
> (one way replication), but also hosts allot of other not so critical
> databases?
> So far, this seems to be working, but I am getting a couple of errors or
> problems in regards to the mysql table for user authentication...  My guess
> is that I more than likely just don't need to replicate that DB from the
> master.
> Would this be considered safe??  Or should I look at a third database server
> for deployment?
> --
> Chris.
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives:
> To unsubscribe:
safe way of replication?Chris Knipe9 Mar
  • Re: safe way of replication?Gary Richardson9 Mar
  • Re: safe way of replication?Chris Knipe9 Mar
  • Re: safe way of replication?Atle Veka9 Mar
    • Re: safe way of replication?Keith Ivey9 Mar
    • read-only and CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE (was: safe way of replication?)Eamon Daly9 Mar