Sergei Golubchik a écrit, Le 11.04.2010 16:27:
> Hi, Davi!
> On Apr 11, Davi Arnaut wrote:
>> Hi Timour,
>> On 4/11/10 12:39 AM, Timour Katchaounov wrote:
>>> Guilhem, guys,
>>> I'd say, enough theoretical talk. Could each proponent
>>> of a specific method of commenting pick some class, and
>>> send to the list a sample with comments for both the
>>> interface and implementation of few class members.
>>> Such an example should contain a complete meaningful
>>> description, not just a formal description of parameters
>>> and results.
>> Besides Monty, I think everybody else is in agreement.
> No, as a heavy ctags user I prefer the function documentation near the
> implementation. With the exception of the public API headers, like
> plugin.h or mysql.h.
> I'm not going to argue my case though. But I would be happy to know a
> solution for ctags users for "documentation in the headers" style.
I remember you raised the ctags problem previously, but I don't remember
what it was (just that it was about ctags not finding information) :-(
Could you please re-explain it?