List:Brisbane MySQL Users Group« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:David Ash Date:February 1 2006 3:03am
Subject:Re: mysql release cycle
View as plain text  
Arjen Lentz wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> David Ash wrote:
>> Regarding the release cycle talked about at the UG last night....
>> Can this be campared to the server release cycle of linux distributions?
>> Can't find the exact values of release cycle and duration of support 
>> but...
>> eg. Redhat has it's server class distributions "redhat enterprise 
>> ES/AS" with a release cycle of years and supports for something like 4 
>> years or so and it's hobbyist distribution "fedora" with a 3-9month 
>> release cycle.
>> When redhat did this, many clients complained as many hobbyists wanted 
>> secure public servers and didn't want to upgrade the OS every 
>> 3-9months,  they don't mind doing bug fix/security updates but a full 
>> OS upgrade was a problem for a server class linux distrubution.
> 
> A MySQL Network subscription would get those users access to binaries on 
> a slower release cycle with only serious/security bugs fixed.
> The key objective of the community builds is "release early and often" 
> to get the latest and greatest. If you run a production system on it, 
> you know what you're doing and you can make decisions on when to 
> upgrade, to what version, and how.
> 
> What you describe above is essentially users (which you call hobbyists) 
> that are running servers that behave like "enterprise servers" but they 
> don't want to take the consequences and either put in their own admin 
> effort, or subscribe to RH or MySQL services designed for that purpose.
> I wouldn't call them hobbyists, given their work environments.
> And anyway, they can't have it both ways... you either spend time to 
> save money, or spend money to save time. Free as in freedom.
> 
> 
>> So will distributions just release mysql major updates more frequently? 
> 
> Most distros are fairly conservative in moving to a new major RDBMS 
> release. I don't see such a move happening as an "update" within a 
> release cycle of a distro.
> Debian for instance tends to backport security fixes into older 
> branches, regardless of what the upstream vendor does.

ok... this solves my main concern
thanks


-- 
David Ash, IT Support Officer, Redlands College
38 Anson Road, Wellington Point 4160, Australia
Home Page: www.davidash.net
(Please send attachments in open standards formats such as PDF, HTML, or 
OpenOffice.)
Thread
mysql release cycleDavid Ash1 Feb
  • Re: mysql release cycleArjen Lentz1 Feb
    • Re: mysql release cycleDavid Ash1 Feb
      • Re: mysql release cycleArjen Lentz1 Feb