| List: | Replication | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Marcus Bointon | Date: | January 20 2012 7:33am |
| Subject: | Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On 19 Jan 2012, at 21:48, Simon wrote: > Has changing from "stop slave" to "STOP SLAVE SQL_THREAD" made such a difference? Seems like it - that's a neat mechanism. BTW if you're gzipping your backups, use pigz instead of gzip - I managed to knock about 80% off my backup time by doing that. Even if you only use it with a single compression thread, it's still faster as it has separate threads for i/o. Marcus -- Marcus Bointon Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/ UK info@hand CRM solutions marcus@stripped | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Simon | 18 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Marcus Bointon | 18 Jan |
| • RE: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Andrew Morgan | 19 Jan |
| • RE: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Richard Bensley | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Marcus Bointon | 19 Jan |
| • RE: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | David Lerer | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Dimitre Radoulov | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | martín arrieta | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Dimitre Radoulov | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | martín arrieta | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Dimitre Radoulov | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Simon | 19 Jan |
| • Re: Slow Slave Replication Catchup | Marcus Bointon | 20 Jan |
