It's a very interesting point but I wonder if the replication, lets say, technology allows
this - it is kind of the oposite of what it delivers.
I mean, different information on different dbs is somenthing you want to avoid, not
provoke.
Still, with some third party 'programs' I bet this can be anchieved.
For instance run a cron every night to just replicate inserts, not deletes - of course
this would not be a real-time slaving
Ricardo
On 2 Nov 2011, at 20:25, Marcus Bointon <marcus@stripped> wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2011, at 19:33, Rick James wrote:
>
>> log_slave_update
>
> Obviously that would need to be enabled for anything to get from B to C, but that's
> not the problem here.
>
> Marcus
> --
> Marcus Bointon
> Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
> UK info@hand CRM solutions
> marcus@stripped | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
>
>
>
>
> --
> MySQL Replication Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/replication
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/replication?unsub=1
>
