Re: Table Locking

[Johan De Meersman]

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mats Kindahl <mats.kindahl@stripped>wrote:

> Also, I wonder why you want to lock the other table?
>

The obvious answer to that would be multimaster writes, I guess.

And where that is concerned, it is worth noting that the latest versions of
5.1 actually have two-phase commit, locally known as (semi-) synchronous
replication.


-- 
Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel