List:Replication« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Johan De Meersman Date:November 8 2010 2:49pm
Subject:Re: Table Locking
View as plain text  
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mats Kindahl <mats.kindahl@stripped>wrote:

> Also, I wonder why you want to lock the other table?
>

The obvious answer to that would be multimaster writes, I guess.

And where that is concerned, it is worth noting that the latest versions of
5.1 actually have two-phase commit, locally known as (semi-) synchronous
replication.


-- 
Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel

Thread
Table LockingTears !8 Nov
  • Re: Table LockingMats Kindahl8 Nov
    • Re: Table LockingJohan De Meersman8 Nov
      • Re: Table LockingMats Kindahl8 Nov
        • Re: Table LockingJohan De Meersman9 Nov
    • Re: Table LockingTears !9 Nov
      • Re: Table LockingJustin Edwards9 Nov
        • Re: Table LockingRick James9 Nov
      • Re: Table LockingMats Kindahl9 Nov
      • Re: Table LockingJohan De Meersman10 Nov
        • Re: Table LockingMarcus Bointon10 Nov