List:Replication« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Johan De Meersman Date:September 13 2010 10:03am
Subject:Re: Unique ID's across multiple databases
View as plain text  
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Kiss Dániel <niel@stripped> wrote:

> offset + increment thingy is good if you know in advance that you'll have a
> limited number of servers. But if you have no idea that you will have 2,
> 20,
> or 200 servers in your array in the future, you just can't pick an optimal

What benefit do you think you will reap from that many masters ? Don't
forget that every write still has to be done on every server, so you're not
actually distributing that load; while for reads you only need simple

Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel

Unique ID's across multiple databasesKiss D├íniel12 Sep
  • Re: Unique ID's across multiple databasesMarcus Bointon12 Sep
    • Re: Unique ID's across multiple databasesMax Schubert12 Sep
  • RE: Unique ID's across multiple databasesJerry Schwartz13 Sep