List:Replication« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Marcus Bointon Date:September 29 2009 3:09pm
Subject:Re: move master?
View as plain text  
On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:29, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:

> Oh, I see. But in that case, why not just set up 'b' as slave to  
> 'a', get it (and 't') caught up, and then stop a, stop the slave on  
> b, and CHANGE MASTER on t?

Sure, you can do it that way too. It's just a practical matter of  
whether a and b are running at the same time.

Marcus
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s
Thread
move master?Chris Kantarjiev28 Sep
  • Re: move master?Marcus Bointon28 Sep
    • Re: move master?Walter Heck - OlinData.com28 Sep
    • Re: move master?Chris Kantarjiev28 Sep
      • Re: move master?Marcus Bointon28 Sep
        • Re: move master?Chris Kantarjiev29 Sep
          • Re: move master?Marcus Bointon29 Sep
    • Re: move master?Chris Kantarjiev28 Sep