Re: move master?

[Marcus Bointon]

On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:29, Chris Kantarjiev wrote:

> Oh, I see. But in that case, why not just set up 'b' as slave to  
> 'a', get it (and 't') caught up, and then stop a, stop the slave on  
> b, and CHANGE MASTER on t?

Sure, you can do it that way too. It's just a practical matter of  
whether a and b are running at the same time.

Marcus
Attachment: [application/pkcs7-signature] smime.p7s