| List: | Replication | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Marcus Bointon | Date: | April 23 2008 6:15pm |
| Subject: | Re: innodb replication | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On 23 Apr 2008, at 19:04, Rick James wrote: > Consistent state, yes. But what about mid-transaction? Might it be > that the snapshot will have half the transaction and have to > ROLLBACK, while the live machine (after UNLOCK) will COMMIT the > transaction? A transaction that didn't commit effectively never happened at all as far as a slave is concerned, so I'd just expect it to catch up from its master, where the transaction did commit. Right? Marcus -- Marcus Bointon Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/ UK resellers of info@hand CRM solutions marcus@stripped | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • innodb replication | Edson Noboru Yamada | 23 Mar |
| • Re: innodb replication | Marcus Bointon | 24 Mar |
| • Re: innodb replication | Ed W | 18 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Marcus Bointon | 18 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Ed W | 18 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Marcus Bointon | 18 Apr |
| • RE: innodb replication | Rick James | 19 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Eric Bergen | 20 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Augusto Bott | 22 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Mark Callaghan | 22 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Augusto Bott | 22 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Eric Bergen | 22 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Augusto Bott | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Eric Bergen | 23 Apr |
| • RE: innodb replication | Rick James | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Marcus Bointon | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Jeremy Cole | 23 Apr |
| • RE: innodb replication | Rick James | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Jeremy Cole | 23 Apr |
| • RE: innodb replication | Rick James | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Marcus Bointon | 23 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Eric Bergen | 24 Apr |
| • Re: innodb replication | Moon's Father | 21 May |
