On Jun 1, 2014, at 2:18 AM, Quentin Armitage <quentin@stripped> wrote:
> Revised patch:
Thanks, it's applied.
> Would you be interested in a patch that
> adds checks for connected?
I think the explicit checks are the problem, rather than the inverse. Attempting to
execute a query on a disconnected object will cause an error, so it’s not like the
problem will go unnoticed.
But, I can’t just remove them — or ask you to remove them — in case
someone is depending on the current behavior. For all I know, someone is doing a string
check on the exact error message, and their code will break if we remove the explicit
I think I will remove them in 4.0, though.