"Use" is always better than "Store" method for big result sets.
So if this change makes no difference to rest of your application, this
must be the one that you try first.
You can always profile and debug your "Store" based solution, but it
will be of academic value (very likely).
Bests,
Dino
On 23/03/11 14:21, Paul Dalach wrote:
> Hi all,
> Thanks for any responses.
>
> The max memory a typical query requires under 100mb...well within my
> 10gb memory limit.
>
> I have tried both debug and release libraries and get the same issue
> with both.
>
> I am trying now to profile the application to find out precisely where
> the hangup is...any suggestions would be welcome.
>
> Any other thoughts? Should I switch to use instead of query?
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 3/23/2011 7:26 AM, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
>> On 23/03/2011 12:22, Joel Fielder wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This isn't aimed at anyone in particular, but the past
>>> couple of days have had topics turn into a discussion about
>>> other stuff.
>>>
>>> It would really help if posters would add OT to the subject,
>>> or specify a new subject if this happens.
>>>
>>> I call this rule "try before you buy" - we all have lots of
>>> email and good email subjects really make a difference to
>>> whether I read or delete :)
>>>
>>> Anybody got any comments or thoughts? Or am I being high
>>> maintenance?
>>>
>>> Joel
>>>
>> No, I think you're absolutely right.
>>
>> The most recent thread in particular has now gone away from the scope
>> of StoreQueryResults.
>>
>> I'm hesitant to comment more on the matter seeing as my suggestion to
>> add a subject line prefix to list mails was shot down so vehemently... :P
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
