On 23/03/2011 12:09, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
> On 23/03/2011 11:59, Warren Young wrote:
>> On 3/23/2011 4:07 AM, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not necessarily strictly doubled.
>>
>> Name an implementation of std::vector that doesn't do this.
>
> I'm in the process of attempting to compile a list of multipliers
> across toolchains. I'll post it when it's done if you're interested.
>
Hi all,
This isn't aimed at anyone in particular, but the past couple of days
have had topics turn into a discussion about other stuff.
It would really help if posters would add OT to the subject, or specify
a new subject if this happens.
I call this rule "try before you buy" - we all have lots of email and
good email subjects really make a difference to whether I read or delete :)
Anybody got any comments or thoughts? Or am I being high maintenance?
Joel
