On 26/01/2011 21:37, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:53:26AM +0000, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote:
>> On 26/01/2011 10:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 26 January 2011 10:38, dan g. wrote:
>>>> Wow, thank you, I did accidentally have an include path that went one
>>>> into ZThread's includes structure.. and there was a Time.h in there.
>>> Eurgh - the perils of case independent filesystems!
>> And of stupid header names. And of having broken include
>> paths. :)
> I dare to diverge from the MySQL++ topic to say that there's nothing
> stupid about having a header named time.h.
> You just need to realize that, to use it, use:
Regardless, I can't imagine what a library-specific header
"time.h" would provide that doesn't suggest it does the same
thing as the standard header of the same name.
I would suggest that the library header needs a more
descriptive name; they're indeed not "magical", but
filenames sure as hell are useful. Or they should be.