From: Warren Young
Date: December 18 2009 1:38pm
Subject: Re: Overloaded store, etc?
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus/8819
Message-Id: <78E399EA-6E38-4027-9D94-EA0132DFE255@etr-usa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec 18, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Jim Wallace wrote:

> what I'd like to see is getting rid of one of the
> overloads to clear up the runtime ambiguity.

As I hinted in my previous reply, I don't think there's a problem of too =
many overloads.  I believe both of your cases start with the same =
overload: the one taking a single STA.  They take different paths after =
the entry point, of course, but again I don't think the fix is removing =
a function.

I rather suspect that Martin Gallwey's r2590 patch might fix things for =
you.  Try svn head and see?

If all it does, then you can get me a Round Tuit for Christmas.

If not, I'll need to know which function you want me to remove and why =
you believe that will help.=