Ken Smith wrote:
> SSQLS looked like a nice solution until I discovered that I can't
> have more than 25 columns (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong -
> which is highly possible!). Many of my tables have much more than 25
I'm still waiting for someone to send me a schema that uses more than 25
columns without also having a good argument for refactoring it. I've
been throwing this challenge down for years now...no takers.