On 27/12/2007, Warren Young wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > There are some problems with ConnectionPool:
>
> Yeah, that can happen when you release a class without ever actually
> using it. ;) Actual use is waiting on me to get around to writing the
> "threading" example program mentioned in the Wishlist.
>
> Do you have a working pool subclass, or are these patches being done in
> vitro, the same way the class was created?
I started out like that but knocked together a very simple
test_pool.cpp with some assertions, which I used to check the basics.
I've attached it, for what it's worth.
> I've checked in a change based on your patch, with quite a lot of
> changes, and not just for style. Comments in line below:
[snip]
> I changed the loop structures for style and clarity reasons. You might
> recheck them in case I broke their function somehow.
All the changes still look correct and I think they're good
improvements. My basic testing still passes (including with GCC's
debug mode - but a mail to follow soon regarding resetdb...)
Thanks, and happy new year.
Jon
Attachment: [text/x-c++src] test_pool.cpp
