Joe Hudson wrote:
> With my template functions, SSQLSes do what I want for now and I've written
> quite a chunk of code that already uses them.
I'm still on the fence about whether to accept your patch. I think my
problem with it is that it's more of a parallel interface w.r.t existing
functionality than a true extension to MySQL++. I think I'm trying to
find some elegant way in my mind to express the concepts of a default
table name, per-struct overrides, and per-instance overrides, all in a
single mechanism. We've got the first two, but the third seems to
require a different mechanism, which bugs me.