Hi all,
this is my first message to the list.
I am using valgrind to check my application that is using mysqlpp to access
a mysql DB.
This is the valgrind message I am concerned about:
==22261== Thread 1:
==22261==
==22261== 111 bytes in 6 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 7
==22261== at 0x4005628: operator new[](unsigned)
(vg_replace_malloc.c:197)
==22261== by 0x404B05F: mysqlpp::Row::at(unsigned) const
(const_string.h:123)==22261== by 0x404B3E6: mysqlpp::Row::operator[](char
const*) const (row.cpp:115)
==22261== by 0x8061FFD:
btau::DBSession::retrieveLastLinkingitem(std::vector<btau::LinkingItemData,
std::allocator<btau::LinkingItemData> >&) const (DBSession.cpp:590)
==22261== by 0x8076395:
btau::ApplicationDataLogicManager::saveTimestampAndLinkingItem(btau::TimeStampData&)
(ApplicationDataLogicManager.cpp:388)
==22261== by 0x8089436:
btau::TSUMessageProcessingThread::manageTimeStampsaveRequest(TSURequest*)
(TSUMessageProcessingThread.cpp:526)
==22261== by 0x8089D6D: btau::TSUMessageProcessingThread::Run()
(TSUMessageProcessingThread.cpp:402)
==22261== by 0x809F402: Thread::StartThread(void*) (Thread.cpp:106)
==22261== by 0x369432: start_thread (in /lib/libpthread-2.4.so)
==22261== by 0x4126A1D: clone (in /lib/libc-2.4.so)
Here is the fragment of my software valgrind is referring to
mysqlpp::Result res = query.store();
mysqlpp::Row row;
if(res.size() > 1){
std::cout << "ERROR: the query select ID_N,XN,LN,SERIAL_N from
LINKING_ITEM where ID_N = (select max(ID_N) from LINKING_ITEM) returned more
than one record " << std::endl;
assert(false);
}
for(unsigned int i=0; i < res.size();i++){
row = res.at(i);
LinkingItemData retrievedData;
std::string value(row["ID_N"]);// >>>>>> line 590 mentioned in
valgrind
message
retrievedData.setID(StringToValuesConverter::toULong(value));
value.assign(row["XN"]);
retrievedData.setXN(value);
value.assign(row["LN"]);
retrievedData.setLN(value);
value.assign(row["SERIAL_N"]);
retrievedData.setSerialN(StringToValuesConverter::toULong(value));
value.assign(row["HASH_ALG"]);
retrievedData.setHashAlg(value);
value.assign(row["ID_AU_SOURCE"]);
retrievedData.setIdAuSource(StringToValuesConverter::toULong(value));
linkingItemList.push_back(retrievedData);
}
Here is my suspect:
const ColData Row::at(size_type i) const
{
if (initialized_) {
const std::string& s = data_.at(i);
return ColData(s.data(), s.length(), res_->types(i),
is_nulls_[i]);
}
else {
if (throw_exceptions())
throw std::out_of_range("Row not initialized");
else
return ColData();
}
}
when the "ColData" copy constructor is invoked, it is like it calls the
const_string copy constructor first, allocating a new buffer and then this
new "const_string" object is initialised by the ColData copy contstructor
/// brief Copy ctor
///
/// param cd the other ColData_Tmpl object
ColData_Tmpl(const ColData_Tmpl<Str>& cd) :
Str(cd.data(), cd.length()),
type_(cd.type_),
null_(cd.null_)
{
}
I am not sure about this, could you please give me some help?
Many thanks.
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Fai squillare la PANTERA ROSA sul tuo cellulare: e' in REGALO
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=6613&d=20071121
