Re: SSQLSv2 design discussion

[Warren Young]

Joel Fielder wrote:
> 
> Also, the ability to apply some transform as the result set goes into
> the SSQLS, e.g. localising a date.

I have zero personal interest in that.  If one wants it, one will have 
to provide a patch.

Fortunately, I think SSQLSv2 should be unusually resistant to ABI 
breakage.  Most changes to it should just change the generated code. 
This might break someone else's ABI, but that's their concern.  :)

This means SSQLSv2 should be free to evolve in interesting ways after 
it's released.  We don't have to boil the ocean today.