Eric C. Anderson wrote:
> It may be small condolence, but I have not had any luck with those
> sql_create_x macros either. They seem to generate code that refuses to
> compile, no matter what you do.
Many people use SSQLS every day successfully, including me, the
library's maintainer. SSQLS is finicky -- which is one reason we're
playing with ideas for replacements -- but it is undeniably useful as-is.
> I have abandoned them, after wasting an entire
> day on it.
Okay, but you'll waste more than one day writing SQL code by hand by
Perhaps you need to study the user guide more carefully. There are
several subtleties in declaring a SSQLS that are non-obvious.