List:MySQL++« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Warren Young Date:October 17 2006 12:04pm
Subject:Re: Problems with timestamp
View as plain text  
Королев Илья wrote:
> 
> Why we can't just drop away static names[] ( and table)? 

How would SSQLS build queries without a table of the field names?

> The only advantage IMHO is that we can change names[](table) on the 
> fly. 

Every single table in my own use of MySQL++ has a different name than 
the corresponding SSQLS.  I am unwilling to give up that feature.
Thread
Problems with timestampКоролев Илья16 Oct
  • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young17 Oct
    • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья17 Oct
      • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young17 Oct
        • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья17 Oct
          • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young17 Oct
            • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья17 Oct
              • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young17 Oct
                • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья17 Oct
                  • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young18 Oct
                    • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья18 Oct
                      • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young18 Oct
                        • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья24 Oct
                          • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young24 Oct
                            • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья25 Oct
                              • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young25 Oct
                                • Re: Problems with timestampКоролев Илья20 Nov
                                  • Re: Problems with timestampWarren Young20 Nov