В сообщении от 17 октября 2006 12:46 Warren Young написал(a):
> Королев Илья wrote:
> > hm... Can you give me a example of using sql_timestamp?
>
> No. It's a mistake, but that doesn't mean I can go yanking features out
> of the library at will.
it is a thousand pities :(
>
> >>> Again about SSQLS and static members. I've made a version of custom.pl
> >>> - which lives without static members, it creates custom_no_static.h and
> >>> custom_no_static-macros.h files. I guess it may be useful.
> >>
> >> You shouldn't need that any more with the most recent two versions of
> >> MySQL++. Do they not solve the problem for you?
> >
> > Is it in SVN? I'll try it
>
> I'm talking about version 2.1.0 where the fix was created, and version
> 2.1.1 where a fix was applied to it for Visual Studio 2003. The only
> reason it wouldn't work for you is if you're using a compiler where the
> feature cannot work.
>
> Search custom.pl for MYSQLPP_NO_STATIC, or see the way this feature is
> tested in examples/util.cpp.
I guess, in such case I can't use field_list() function? Beside, field_list()
use names[], but in my patch there are no names[] at all.
