| List: | MySQL++ | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Warren Young | Date: | September 21 2006 12:31pm |
| Subject: | Re: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Julien Chavanton wrote:
> I was thinking the Mysql++ api was thread safe
Not even a little bit.
The only thing we do right now is allow you to link MySQL++ to the
thread-aware versions of your C and C++ standard libraries if you want,
so calls down into those don't blow the program up when you use threads.
MySQL++ itself has no awareness of threads.
We will be extending the current Lock class at some point to add some
thread safety, but right now, it's completely useless for that purpose.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Julien Chavanton | 18 Sep |
| • RE: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Julien Chavanton | 18 Sep |
| • Re: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Warren Young | 19 Sep |
| • RE: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Julien Chavanton | 20 Sep |
| • Re: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Warren Young | 21 Sep |
| • RE: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Julien Chavanton | 20 Sep |
| • RE: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Julien Chavanton | 20 Sep |
| • RE: Connection sharing vs lost of query per connections | Matt Dargavel | 21 Sep |
