Carlos Flores wrote:
> Aparently it has something to do with bakefile,
Not really. The new link problem in v2.1 was due to not having the -l
flags in the right order. Some linkers -- including MinGW's -- care
about that. Technically, the problem was introduced with the Bakefile
change, but it was my fault for not seeing this.
> with those _decspec(dllexport) included, which is evil
Evil has nothing to do with it. They are _necessary_ for Visual C++,
and I thought they were necessary for MinGW since GCC supports the syntax.
But this comment of yours made me wonder, what happens if you try to
build a DLL with the declspecs turned off? Guess what: it works! I
don't know why MinGW's GCC bothers to support this syntax if it doesn't
do the right thing with it. Grrrr....
v2.1.1 will appear soon.