List:MySQL++« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Warren Young Date:March 21 2006 8:11pm
Subject:Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?
View as plain text  
Johannes Schaub wrote:
> 
> perhaps this problem could be solved by creating an additional 
operator[] which
> takes just a "const int", 

I tried it, and couldn't get it to work.  There seem to be additional 
overloading problems down that path.  If you can make it work, I'd love 
to see a patch for this, since just adding some more overloads mean we 
don't have to wait for v3.0 to fix this.
Thread
Row::at() doesn't take const int?alan.alvarez18 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Warren Young20 Mar
Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?alan.alvarez20 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Pedro LamarĂ£o20 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Warren Young20 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Johannes Schaub21 Mar
    • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Warren Young21 Mar
Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?alan.alvarez20 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Pedro LamarĂ£o21 Mar
  • Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?Warren Young21 Mar