From: Warren Young
Date: March 20 2006 12:28pm
Subject: Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus/5547
Message-Id: <441E9FDC.80600@etr-usa.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

alan.alvarez@stripped wrote:
> Is there a reason why Row::at() doesn't take constant unsigned ints?
> same with the [] operator.

Since size_type is a typedef for unsigned int, I guess you're 
complaining that it isn't const?  What value could making it const 
possibly provide?  Constness only matters with reference and pointer 
parameters.