Re: Row::at() doesn't take const int?

[Warren Young]

alan.alvarez@stripped wrote:
> Is there a reason why Row::at() doesn't take constant unsigned ints?
> same with the [] operator.

Since size_type is a typedef for unsigned int, I guess you're 
complaining that it isn't const?  What value could making it const 
possibly provide?  Constness only matters with reference and pointer 
parameters.