On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 15:15 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> This truncation bug may be fixable.
That's good news. :-)
> But, don't expect it to be possible to define an SSQLS with "200
> in binary format" and have the one BLOB field be busted out into
> 200 individual fields. SSQLS requires a 1:1 relationship between
> in your structure and fields in the database.
Sure, I do understand that. I'd cast the data from the SSQLS structure
into floats after the query.
> I've put your truncation bug on the Wishlist. Since it's your itch,
> you're in the best position to scratch it. I don't have any idea when
> I can get around to it.