List:MySQL++« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Viktor STARK Date:November 28 2005 11:18pm
Subject:Re: BLOB in an SSQLS
View as plain text  
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 15:15 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
> This truncation bug may be fixable.
That's good news. :-)
> 
> But, don't expect it to be possible to define an SSQLS with "200
> floats 
> in binary format" and have the one BLOB field be busted out into
> those 
> 200 individual fields.  SSQLS requires a 1:1 relationship between
> fields 
> in your structure and fields in the database.
Sure, I do understand that. I'd cast the data from the SSQLS structure
into floats after the query.

> I've put your truncation bug on the Wishlist.  Since it's your itch, 
> you're in the best position to scratch it.  I don't have any idea when
> I can get around to it.

Thanks.

Viktor STARK

Thread
BLOB in an SSQLSViktor STARK28 Nov
  • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSChris Frey28 Nov
    • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSChris Frey28 Nov
      • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSWarren Young28 Nov
        • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSChris Frey28 Nov
  • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSWarren Young28 Nov
    • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSChris Frey28 Nov
      • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSWarren Young28 Nov
      • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSViktor STARK29 Nov
    • Re: BLOB in an SSQLSViktor STARK29 Nov