>dengxy wrote:
>>
>> And, it seems you are in eager step to get rid of MinGW support
>
>No. I am simply unwilling to keep broken features in the library.
>
>This is not a permanent decision. I just need to be convinced that
>there is a working configuration, and support will reappear.
>
Very glad to hear this:)
>> Can I just suggest you not be so impatient :) ?
>
>Can I suggest that if you want the MinGW DLL build to work, that you get
>to work on it? This is open source. You're supposed to scratch your
>own itch, not whine when someone refuses to scratch it for you.
>
OK, I got your point, and of course, I totally agree, though
I'm still a beginner:). That's what open source should be.
People should prefer work to wait. Hope we won't wait for long!
And great appreciation for your work!
Best regards
