| List: | MySQL++ | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Earl Miles | Date: | July 21 2005 2:55pm |
| Subject: | Re: reply-to discussion | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Chris Frey wrote: > When I come across broken mailing list configurations, such as mysql++'s ;-) > I use the following procmail recipe, and everyone's happy. (Or at least I am) > > ####### mysql++ > :0 > * List-ID:.*plusplus.mysql.com > { > # filter the Reply-To: line so it goes to the list, not the sender > :0hfW > | formail -Ybi "Reply-To: plusplus@stripped" > > # send to proper mailbox > :0 > plusplus > } Oh! That's absolutely excellent! I'd never thought about having procmail actually do that for me, even tho I use it extensively for a few other things. Thanks for the recipe!
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | np | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Chris Frey | 21 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Earl Miles | 21 Jul |
