List:MySQL++« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Chris Frey Date:July 21 2005 10:41am
Subject:Re: reply-to discussion
View as plain text  
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:56:21AM -0700, Earl Miles wrote:
> Warren Young wrote:
> >Earl Miles wrote:
>
[reply-to discussion snipped]

When I come across broken mailing list configurations, such as mysql++'s ;-)  
I use the following procmail recipe, and everyone's happy. (Or at least I am)


####### mysql++
:0
* List-ID:.*plusplus.mysql.com
{
        # filter the Reply-To: line so it goes to the list, not the sender
        :0hfW
        | formail -Ybi "Reply-To: plusplus@stripped"

        # send to proper mailbox
        :0
        plusplus
}


- Chris

Thread
Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ???np18 Jul
  • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
    • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
      • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
        • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
        • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
          • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
            • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
              • Re: reply-to discussionChris Frey21 Jul
                • Re: reply-to discussionEarl Miles21 Jul