| List: | MySQL++ | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Chris Frey | Date: | July 21 2005 10:41am |
| Subject: | Re: reply-to discussion | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:56:21AM -0700, Earl Miles wrote: > Warren Young wrote: > >Earl Miles wrote: > [reply-to discussion snipped] When I come across broken mailing list configurations, such as mysql++'s ;-) I use the following procmail recipe, and everyone's happy. (Or at least I am) ####### mysql++ :0 * List-ID:.*plusplus.mysql.com { # filter the Reply-To: line so it goes to the list, not the sender :0hfW | formail -Ybi "Reply-To: plusplus@stripped" # send to proper mailbox :0 plusplus } - Chris
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | np | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Chris Frey | 21 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Earl Miles | 21 Jul |
