Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ???

[Warren Young]

Earl Miles wrote:

> Ok, that's one of the more arrogant arguments I've ever read, 

It doesn't matter what you think of the argument, many people out there 
hold it.  FWIW, the author of that would probably think it arrogant to 
hold your position, too.  Point is, it's a touchy issue.

>  it
> does convince me to no longer bother to delete the extra address when I 
> hit reply-to, causing the author to get a double copy of the message.

??  That's one of the things I _don't_ want.  Decide who you want to 
respond to: the list, or to the original poster, but never both; and 
prefer the list.