| List: | MySQL++ | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Warren Young | Date: | July 18 2005 4:08pm |
| Subject: | Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Warren Young wrote: > People think, "Oh, Warren maintains this thing, so he must > know the most about it, so I'll send it to him." That, and blind Reply-Alls, forgetting to strip personal addresses before sending the message. I don't need two copies of every message replying to messages I sent to the list...
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | np | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Chris Frey | 21 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Earl Miles | 21 Jul |
