| List: | MySQL++ | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Warren Young | Date: | July 18 2005 3:56pm |
| Subject: | Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Earl Miles wrote: > could it be changed > so that Reply goes to the list, rather than the author? This is an ancient battle, and those on either side are pretty well entrenched. Here's the opposing position: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Besides, I don't think that most of the personal email traffic I get is due to this. People think, "Oh, Warren maintains this thing, so he must know the most about it, so I'll send it to him." The sentiment may be true, or may not, but that's beside the point. The purpose of the mailing list is to raise all boats, not free tech support.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ??? | np | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Warren Young | 18 Jul |
| • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ??? | Earl Miles | 18 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Chris Frey | 21 Jul |
| • Re: reply-to discussion | Earl Miles | 21 Jul |
