List:MySQL++« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Earl Miles Date:July 18 2005 3:17pm
Subject:Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed
by 'long'is illegal ???
View as plain text  
Warren Young wrote:
> P.S. Please do not email me directly.  Keep this thread on the mailing 
> list.

A lot of people are going to do that, because the list isn't set up with a 
Reply-To: to send things back to the list, so you have to remember to Reply-All 
(which I often forget and realize about 5 minutes later when the msg doesn't 
show up and go resend it to the list). And with Reply-All you still end up 
sending 2 copies to the original author.

I know the list is hosted by mysql.com, and am not sure if anyone actually has 
admin abilities on the list; but if so, could it be changed so that Reply goes 
to the list, rather than the author? I think it's much more common for people to 
want to send stuff to the list than directly to an author. Every other list I'm 
on is set up with a Reply-To: to the list.


Thread
Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followed by 'long'is illegal ???np18 Jul
  • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
    • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
      • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
        • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
        • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
          • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Warren Young18 Jul
            • Re: Re : Re: VS 2003 / Mysql++ 1.7(or 2.0 b) =>__int64 followedby 'long'is illegal ???Earl Miles18 Jul
              • Re: reply-to discussionChris Frey21 Jul
                • Re: reply-to discussionEarl Miles21 Jul