Byrial Jensen wrote:
>
> So my question is: Do MySQL++ have a limitation so it only works with
> one actice Connection object at a time,
If it does, it's considered a bug. Patches thoughtfully considered.
> And another question: Do you think that it would be more efficient to
> store inserts + updates in for example a local file, and not send these
> queries to the database until after the mysqlpp::ResUse object is deleted.
Probably not. If anything, I'd make the second database local, and do
your final analysis there. It sounds like both databases are remote, in
which case your bottleneck is the bandwidth of the link to the database.
Unless you've got serious pipe, your disk bandwidth will be a lot higher.
