From: Chris Frey
Date: May 6 2005 7:10pm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc 4.0.0 fixes
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus/4360
Message-Id: <20050506191004.GA10115@netdirect.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:19:25AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> Chris Frey wrote:
> 
> >- some virtual destructors for classes that have virtual functions.
> 
> I'm pretty sure this will break the ABI, so I'm going to have to hold 
> off on that change.  Other than that, I've added your patch.  Thanks.

Cool, thanks.

> One of the reasons I'm looking at moving to a public repository is so we 
> can fork off v1.8 or v2.0 [*].  It will go through a period where I 
> don't want to release it formally, but it will still need wide testing. 
>  I hope by having it in a public repository, some people will start 
> using the repository version while v1.7 is frozen and provide that testing.

Unless you're planning to give people write access to the repository,
it's not strictly necessary to have a public one.  Just make regular
releases of the dev tarballs.

A public repository would be handy for checking diffs though from old
versions.  You just don't need it first. :-)

- Chris