On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 05:19:25AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> Chris Frey wrote:
> >- some virtual destructors for classes that have virtual functions.
> I'm pretty sure this will break the ABI, so I'm going to have to hold
> off on that change. Other than that, I've added your patch. Thanks.
> One of the reasons I'm looking at moving to a public repository is so we
> can fork off v1.8 or v2.0 [*]. It will go through a period where I
> don't want to release it formally, but it will still need wide testing.
> I hope by having it in a public repository, some people will start
> using the repository version while v1.7 is frozen and provide that testing.
Unless you're planning to give people write access to the repository,
it's not strictly necessary to have a public one. Just make regular
releases of the dev tarballs.
A public repository would be handy for checking diffs though from old
versions. You just don't need it first. :-)