From: Date: April 29 2005 3:00pm
Subject: RE: sql_create_basic_* useful?
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus/4308
Message-Id: <783413DD86779A4D804B1EF36B83D85BCCF646@eslum01.cnt.ad.cnt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This may not be a good reason to keep them, but when I was having
trouble using sql_create_* in a header file, I found that I could use
sql_create_basic_* because that doesn't create the "table" and "names[]"
variables.  I guess its possible that someone else discovered this and
is using it in a header file.

That's about all I can think of.

-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Young [mailto:mysqlpp@stripped]=20
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 8:26 AM
To: MySQL++ Mailing List
Subject: sql_create_basic_* useful?

It occurs to me that the sql_create_basic_* macros are no easier to use
than the regular sql_create macros, and the SSQLS structures they
generate have fewer features.  I've already decided, while working on
the new documentation, to relegate discussion of these simpler macros to
a side discussion and focus on the more powerful but just as easy to use
macros.

Does anyone actually use sql_create_basic_*?  If so, why?

If it seems they have no practical value, I'll deprecate them, and
eventually remove them.  No sense complicating the documentation and the
code with features we don't use.

--=20
MySQL++ Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/plusplus?unsub=3Dmark_merendino@stripped