On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:03:01PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> Trying to track down this bug... interesting that it only happens with
> mysql 5. From the backtrace, it looks like the field name is known by
> mysql++, since Row::operator has an arg of i=5, so the lookup by name
> must have worked.
Hmmmm, on second thought, there are only 5 fields in the example stock table,
so this is incorrect.
Patrick... if you are in the debugging mood, trace through the
FieldNames::init() function in field_names.cpp, and see if you find any
oddities in the field names that are added.
I don't run mysql 5 yet, so I can't easily test it.