thanks for your answer. in fact thats how fork() is supposed to be.
if its a good idea or not to share handles depends on various things and exceeds the topic
of this discussion. i just wonder why this module was working as expected and this
behaviour was changed.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:15:32 +0200
"Ulrich Borchers" <borchers@stripped> wrote:
> imho to share a single connection between serveral processes is not a good idea
> after fork() you can disconnect and reconnect, thus creating a new
> database handle for the child process.