I agree.
I don't see any reason to let a non-subscriber post.
How would you expect he reads the answer?
It's kind of like letting strangers piss in your water supply.
Marjolein Katsma wrote:
>Carl,
>
>You'll be missed but I can't blame you.
>
>I'm tired enough of getting this kind of pam in my personal mailboxes, I don't need an
> additional load from this list. Worst is that I've changed to using a SneakEmail address
> to combat spam from spambots harvesting addresses from mail lists - but now I cannot even
> report these spams because SneakEmail creates its own headers.
>
>The list is too valuable for me to leave - but it really SHOULD be subscription only.
> This spamming is getting out of hand!
>
>At 09:50 2002-01-10, you wrote:
>
>>118526stockalert@stripped writes:
>>
>>>OTC News Alerts' Last 3 Picks have gained 358%!
>>>Here is our next Hot Pick!
>>>
>>That's it. I'm out of here too.
>>
>>//C - wonders what the list owner gets for letting the spam in. 10%?
>>
>>--
>>Carl Troein - Círdan / Istari-PixelMagic - UIN 16353280
>>carl@stripped | http://pixelmagic.dyndns.org/~cirdan/
>>Amiga user since '89, and damned proud of it too.
>>
>>mysql
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Before posting, please check:
>> http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
>> http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
>>
>>To request this thread, e-mail <mysql-thread95939@stripped>
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail
> <mysql-unsubscribe-jf2fn001=sneakemail.com@stripped>
>>Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>>
>
>
>
>
