Shouldn't the type be myisam instead of myisamchk?
Martin MOKREJS( wrote:
> is there any reason why ISAM tables from 3.22 up to 3.23.36 would appear
> to be broken to 3.23.42 (with "broken: I mean):
> mysql-3.23.42> alter table tbl type=myisamchk;
> mysql-3.23.42> check table tbl;
> while being fine under 3.22 up to 3.23.36?
> We are investigating here some problem and not sure if this might be the
> case or not. Thanks.
> Please Cc: me in reply.
Gerald L. Clark