List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jeremy Zawodny Date:October 11 2001 5:55am
Subject:Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processor
View as plain text  
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:24:21PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> 
> That's correct; FreeBSD-4's thread model is userland threads in a
> single process, managed by signals.  The Linux multiple-process
> threading model is available (via the Linuxthreads port), and
> there's an option to build the mysql port with it, but the comments
> in mysql's makefile suggest that it's not stable.

Folks who have used it seem to believe that it's quite stable, so the
comments may be a bit outdated.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny, <jzawodn@stripped>
Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance
Desk: (408) 349-7878   Fax: (408) 349-5454   Cell: (408) 685-5936

MySQL 3.23.41-max: up 35 days, processed 769,273,638 queries (253/sec. avg)
Thread
FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorPhilip Mak11 Oct
  • Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorDan Nelson11 Oct
    • Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorPhilip Mak11 Oct
      • Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorDan Nelson11 Oct
        • Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorJeremy Zawodny11 Oct
        • Re: FreeBSD v.s. Linux on dual processorIlya Martynov12 Oct