From: Date: September 27 2001 3:14pm
Subject: Re: replication implementation.
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/86519
Message-Id: <20010927151448.F2038@spin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi.

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 10:02:46PM +1000, jason@stripped wrote:
[...]
> How's it going for you - is it in production use yet, and under
> reasonable load?

I had it running on a production server for about 2.500.00 queries and
didn't notice any problem (it's still running, but the slave not
fetching). I did not notice any discrepancies in the comparisons I
made.

On the other hand, I rarely use ALTER TABLE, so I wouldn't have
noticed any problem with that, as you did.

> I'm having problems with my master(s) not logging all queries to the
> binary log, and as a result, the slaves don't get the changes, since
> they read the binary log to know what to do. I've posted here about
> it a couple of times and not had a single reply, not even a 'please
> submit a bug report because no, that's not a known issue' or a 'no,
> mine's working perfectly in production, you're doing something
> wrong'

Well, you asked yesterday, if anyone else has had problems with
replication where only some queries are logged... not the kind of
question I would answer "No, I haven't had any problems" without
having anything more to say.

As you suggest yourself, best idea is probably to try to make a
reproducible test case (including the output in the replication log)
and send that to the bugs list.

Bye,

	Benjamin.


-- 
benjamin-mysql@stripped