David Johnson writes:
> Hi!
> My project has a bunch of tables with MEDIUMBLOB columns. There is a very,
> very tiny possibility that we will eventually exceed the MEDIUMBLOB size in
> the distant future, so my bosses are suggesting we just go with LONGBLOBS
> everywhere. Is there any extra performance cost to this besides the extra
> bite for the size?
>
> Thanks!
> DJ
Hi!
No, there should not be any. Only few extra bytes in ISAM.
Sinisa
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| TcX ____ __ _____ _____ ___ == mysql@stripped |
| /*/\*\/\*\ /*/ \*\ /*/ \*\ |*| Sinisa Milivojevic |
| /*/ /*/ /*/ \*\_ |*| |*||*| mailto:sinisa@stripped |
| /*/ /*/ /*/\*\/*/ \*\|*| |*||*| Belgrade |
| /*/ /*/ /*/\*\_/*/ \*\_/*/ |*|_____ Serbia |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^/*/^^^^^^^^^^^\*\^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| /*/ \*\ Developers Team |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+