List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:BAUMEISTER Alexandre Date:July 14 2001 2:51pm
Subject:Re[2]: Replication and InnoDB
View as plain text  
Sinisa,

SM> It is the same. Replication works already with all table handlers,
SM> but all that remains to be solved is ROLLBACK.

  What  could  be  the  problem  is  servers  are  recording  in their
  binary log only committed transactions ?

  Why should ROLLBACK be implemented in replication ?

  If  only  committed transactions are recorded in the binary log then
  if  a  server  crashes  and  it  has  to  rollback  it's uncommitted
  transactions,  this has no impact on the replicating scheme isn't it
  ?

  Let me know if I'm wrong.

  Regards,
  Alex.

Thread
Replication and InnoDBJörg Beckmann13 Jul
  • Re: Replication and InnoDBSinisa Milivojevic13 Jul
    • Re: Replication and InnoDBChristian Jaeger14 Jul
      • Re: Replication and InnoDBSinisa Milivojevic14 Jul
        • Re[2]: Replication and InnoDBBAUMEISTER Alexandre14 Jul
Re:Replication and InnoDBHeikki Tuuri15 Jul