| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | William M. Shubert | Date: | July 14 2001 3:44am |
| Subject: | Sorry, no need to answer question about unions... | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Ugh, I couldn't find the mailing list archives until I looked at the
bottom of my own message that got mailed back to me! I searched, found
out about the temporary table workaround for no unions, sorry for
bothering you all with a question that had been answered before. I'm
still eager for MySql to have "real" unions so I can simplify my sql
code, but this looks good enough for now!
--
Bill Shubert (wms@stripped)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Sorry, no need to answer question about unions... | William M. Shubert | 14 Jul |
| • Re: Sorry, no need to answer question about unions... | Jeremy Zawodny | 14 Jul |
