List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:William M. Shubert Date:July 14 2001 3:44am
Subject:Sorry, no need to answer question about unions...
View as plain text  
Ugh, I couldn't find the mailing list archives until I looked at the
bottom of my own message that got mailed back to me! I searched, found
out about the temporary table workaround for no unions, sorry for
bothering you all with a question that had been answered before. I'm
still eager for MySql to have "real" unions so I can simplify my sql
code, but this looks good enough for now!
-- 
				Bill Shubert (wms@stripped)
Thread
Sorry, no need to answer question about unions...William M. Shubert14 Jul
  • Re: Sorry, no need to answer question about unions...Jeremy Zawodny14 Jul